Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ScuzzaMan's avatar

I think I mentioned previously that James P Hogan's "Kicking the Sacred Cow" describes how the Big Bangers predicted 30 t0 50 K CMB while the Steady Staters predicted 3 to 5 K.

The Steady Staters were right on target but "somehow" the Big Bangers won out "through better marketing".

Marketing costs money.

Ever wonder where it came from?

Expand full comment
the Martian's avatar

Having studied at length and great depth the assassinations of Lincoln and JFK, I am keenly aware of the production of false narratives to explain the event. In the Lincoln assassination, the coverup was rather simple, there being only ONE source of information from the "investigation" that being Edwin Stanton who had so very much to lose if the truth had come out. The investigation and coverup in the JFK assassination is remarkably similar (and not the usual tale of curious parallels like the assassin went from a theater to a warehouse in Lincoln' case and the other went from a warehouse to a theater - another false-positive for the unsuspecting public) but the problem in the JFK assassination is that there is not a single coverup going on. The DPD, the FBI, the CIA, the Secret Service, and the Mainstream Media all muddied the waters in one way or another and for their own motives. Sorting through this pile of hogwash makes investigating the case the enigma in the confusion. Mark Lane's RUSH TO JUDGMENT was a part of the coverup and utilized a gatekeeper. The 9/11 event has all the same signs as the earlier incidents and in studying those cases to understand the coverups, you can arrive at the truth, or get pretty close to it. Dr. Wood seems to have gotten closer than anyone else.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts