I think I mentioned previously that James P Hogan's "Kicking the Sacred Cow" describes how the Big Bangers predicted 30 t0 50 K CMB while the Steady Staters predicted 3 to 5 K.
The Steady Staters were right on target but "somehow" the Big Bangers won out "through better marketing".
Having studied at length and great depth the assassinations of Lincoln and JFK, I am keenly aware of the production of false narratives to explain the event. In the Lincoln assassination, the coverup was rather simple, there being only ONE source of information from the "investigation" that being Edwin Stanton who had so very much to lose if the truth had come out. The investigation and coverup in the JFK assassination is remarkably similar (and not the usual tale of curious parallels like the assassin went from a theater to a warehouse in Lincoln' case and the other went from a warehouse to a theater - another false-positive for the unsuspecting public) but the problem in the JFK assassination is that there is not a single coverup going on. The DPD, the FBI, the CIA, the Secret Service, and the Mainstream Media all muddied the waters in one way or another and for their own motives. Sorting through this pile of hogwash makes investigating the case the enigma in the confusion. Mark Lane's RUSH TO JUDGMENT was a part of the coverup and utilized a gatekeeper. The 9/11 event has all the same signs as the earlier incidents and in studying those cases to understand the coverups, you can arrive at the truth, or get pretty close to it. Dr. Wood seems to have gotten closer than anyone else.
After 23 years of using my double EE degree to defend my sensibilities against everything but the official 9/11 WTC narratives, I finally found Dr. Judy Wood in 2024. Once you see the metal antenna tower and steel beams disintegrating into dust as they fall, you can't unsee it. Whatever "the authorities" say happened on 9/11, the evidence says truth is way different. Dr. Wood's book isn't a narrative. It's a carefully crafted and comprehensive engineering textbook of high academic quality and value. She's got the receipts, she does all the math. It's a keeper for the ages on anybody's bookshelf.
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Figuring out the One True Explanation is as much a psyop as believing the official explanation(s).
No matter what the Truth may eventually be discovered to be, the one thing we can always be absolutely certain of is that the official story contains deliberate malignant lies.
It is far more important that people recognise our common enemy and reject their lies than it is that we squabble amongst ourselves over the details of the truth.
The truth is that our ruling elites hate us for our freedom and they are intent on removing it as expeditiously and permanently as possible.
Dr. Wood's incalculably valuable contribution to the 9/11 WTC collapse narrative is not that she has produced a conclusive alternative explanation. She hasn't. Dr. Wood's contribution is that she has completely obliterated the narrative offered up by the "official experts." Her facts are indisputable. That's why the only defense they can muster against her discoveries is to suppress and censor them.
Actually not. The truth has been discovered, the issue is that the 9/11 "truth" movement was infiltrated in 2005 and is mostly a movement, AWAY from truth.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
I think I mentioned previously that James P Hogan's "Kicking the Sacred Cow" describes how the Big Bangers predicted 30 t0 50 K CMB while the Steady Staters predicted 3 to 5 K.
The Steady Staters were right on target but "somehow" the Big Bangers won out "through better marketing".
Marketing costs money.
Ever wonder where it came from?
Having studied at length and great depth the assassinations of Lincoln and JFK, I am keenly aware of the production of false narratives to explain the event. In the Lincoln assassination, the coverup was rather simple, there being only ONE source of information from the "investigation" that being Edwin Stanton who had so very much to lose if the truth had come out. The investigation and coverup in the JFK assassination is remarkably similar (and not the usual tale of curious parallels like the assassin went from a theater to a warehouse in Lincoln' case and the other went from a warehouse to a theater - another false-positive for the unsuspecting public) but the problem in the JFK assassination is that there is not a single coverup going on. The DPD, the FBI, the CIA, the Secret Service, and the Mainstream Media all muddied the waters in one way or another and for their own motives. Sorting through this pile of hogwash makes investigating the case the enigma in the confusion. Mark Lane's RUSH TO JUDGMENT was a part of the coverup and utilized a gatekeeper. The 9/11 event has all the same signs as the earlier incidents and in studying those cases to understand the coverups, you can arrive at the truth, or get pretty close to it. Dr. Wood seems to have gotten closer than anyone else.
Are they aware of the work of Dr Judy Wood and her book: Where did the towers go?
Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.
Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist
Aware of her, and heard her on Jerm Warfare a couple of years ago. She speaks authoritatively. Haven't read her book.
After 23 years of using my double EE degree to defend my sensibilities against everything but the official 9/11 WTC narratives, I finally found Dr. Judy Wood in 2024. Once you see the metal antenna tower and steel beams disintegrating into dust as they fall, you can't unsee it. Whatever "the authorities" say happened on 9/11, the evidence says truth is way different. Dr. Wood's book isn't a narrative. It's a carefully crafted and comprehensive engineering textbook of high academic quality and value. She's got the receipts, she does all the math. It's a keeper for the ages on anybody's bookshelf.
O, it's a must read, for anyone who want to understand the evidence of what happened on 9/11.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Figuring out the One True Explanation is as much a psyop as believing the official explanation(s).
No matter what the Truth may eventually be discovered to be, the one thing we can always be absolutely certain of is that the official story contains deliberate malignant lies.
It is far more important that people recognise our common enemy and reject their lies than it is that we squabble amongst ourselves over the details of the truth.
The truth is that our ruling elites hate us for our freedom and they are intent on removing it as expeditiously and permanently as possible.
The rest is irrelevant.
Dr. Wood's incalculably valuable contribution to the 9/11 WTC collapse narrative is not that she has produced a conclusive alternative explanation. She hasn't. Dr. Wood's contribution is that she has completely obliterated the narrative offered up by the "official experts." Her facts are indisputable. That's why the only defense they can muster against her discoveries is to suppress and censor them.
Actually not. The truth has been discovered, the issue is that the 9/11 "truth" movement was infiltrated in 2005 and is mostly a movement, AWAY from truth.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Read their court filings.
Dr Morgan Reynolds: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Judy Wood: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 2012 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Q.E.D.