Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hans G. Schantz's avatar

No. That's exactly the problem in the common model or understanding: assuming that energy is associated with a particular field instead of being guided by the field. And you have my program backwards. I started with trying to understand how EM works. It turns out to look like the pilot wave theory. The importation is from classical EM into QM, not the other way around.

You’ll find some of the preliminary technical foundation for Fields & Energy in the papers, “Energy Velocity and Reactive Fields,” in my paper, “On Energy Flow in Standing Waves,” and in my paper “Energy Flow for Reflecting & Interacting Beams.” Links are in my intro post, if you'd like to dig into it in more detail.

https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/fields-and-energy

Expand full comment
Sol Sön's avatar

Interesting topic.

I guess to get the full picture you should research gases and their properties.

According to unconventional theories, gasses are the glue of our cosmos, all electro and magnetic phenomenas are happening because of them.

Electrochemistry is an other “since long” hidden branch of physics which should get more attention.

Thank you for sharing.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts